redline
07-08-2006, 08:59 PM
I've decided that since I'm not ready to spend the necessary money to get a decent wide-angle lens for my Canon 10D, that I'd invest in some flashes. I talked to Kameraguy a while back regarding the subject, so first I'll sum up what I already know, then compare some flash units. Hopefully this thread will help others who might be in the market as well.
What i'm trying to achieve, is to have multiple flashes setup off camera, but all triggered in sync by the camera shutter release button. I still want to retain TTL metering with an on camera unit (or dedicated flash unit).
Now the easiest, but most expensive way of going about this would be to purchse 2 or 3 flashes, and trigger them with pocket wizards, or a Canon ST-E2 (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=NavBar&A=search&Q=&ci=8480) One transmitter and reciever would set me back $295.00 alone. Plus another $184 x2 for the aditional flash units. Plus, if I wanted to keep TTL for all units I think I'd have to purchase one of these (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=64228&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation), but I'm not positive. Another product is the Microsync, an equally epensive option (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=search&Q=&b=1876&mnp=0.0&mxp=0.0&Submit.x=5&Submit.y=11&Submit=Go&shs=radio+slaves&ci=1&ac=). Also of mention is the high price of the flashes themselves. IMO Canon's flashes are rip-offs (see below comparison). SO, basically I'm going to try to acheive the same effect on the cheap.
First up, lets do a flash comparison. I'll be comparing flash units that are around $200.00 (Canon application).
First up is the Canon 430EX: ($234.00 at BHPhoto http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=397664&is=USA&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation ). From the Canon website:
This exciting new addition to the EOS System combines compact size and affordability with an added dose of features and sophistication. Improving on the previous model, Speedlite 420EX, the new 430EX can now be set into manual flash mode (full power~1/64). Flash compensation can be set on the flash unit, and manual control of the flash zoom head is now possible. Improvements in its circuitry make recycle time 40% faster, and since it is compatible with Canon's wireless E-TTL, it can be used as an affordable "slave unit."
The Basic stats are as follows:
GN (Guide Number): 141 ft./43m (at ISO 100); flash head at 105mm zoom setting.
Number of flashes per battery life: Approx. 200 to 1,400, with AA-size Alkaline Batteries.
Recycling Time: Approx. 0.1 to 3.7 seconds
Weight: 11.6 oz without batteries.
(Full Stats avalible here: http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelTechSpecsAct&fcategoryid=141&modelid=11923 )
Second is the SunPak PZ5000: ($147 at BH Photo http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=177009&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation) Specs as follows:
GN (Guide Number): 165' (50.3 m) at 85mm;
180' (54.9 m) at 135m
Number of flashes per battery life: N/A
Recycling Time: 0.3-13 Seconds (based on fresh batteries & full power)
Weight: 12.96 oz without batteries.
Both units can be operated in full manual mode, TTL, and slave modes. So if you ask me, the Sunpak is the better deal. It offers close to the same performance as the Canon, for a cheaper price.
So far, the bill is $ 147.50 without shipping from BHphotovideo.com. I also said that I'm going to want to fire multiple units, so as opposed to having to purchase multiple SunPak's, I thought I'd search for some older, cheaper flashes that can function as slaves.
1.) http://cgi.ebay.com/SUNPAK-AUTO-THYRISTOR-144-FLASH-w-BOX-LN-1-00NR_W0QQitemZ150005073078QQihZ005QQcategoryZ48549 QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem + http://cgi.ebay.com/Flash-Slave-with-External-Sync-NEW_W0QQitemZ120003119363QQihZ002QQcategoryZ30086Q QrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem + http://cgi.ebay.com/Wireless-Radio-Remote-Flash-Strobe-slave-Trigger-Studio_W0QQitemZ150007998626QQihZ005QQcategoryZ300 84QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
2.) Another 144 http://cgi.ebay.com/SUNPAK-144D-Multi-Dedicated-Auto-FLASH-Nice-gl_W0QQitemZ110004440323QQihZ001QQcategoryZ48549QQ rdZ1QQcmdZViewItem + above link +above link.
So thats an estimated $50-$80 added onto the tab of $147.50. What i'm wondering is first, if there are any problems with this setup , and second if there are any other suggestions on how to go about this setup. Thanks!
What i'm trying to achieve, is to have multiple flashes setup off camera, but all triggered in sync by the camera shutter release button. I still want to retain TTL metering with an on camera unit (or dedicated flash unit).
Now the easiest, but most expensive way of going about this would be to purchse 2 or 3 flashes, and trigger them with pocket wizards, or a Canon ST-E2 (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=NavBar&A=search&Q=&ci=8480) One transmitter and reciever would set me back $295.00 alone. Plus another $184 x2 for the aditional flash units. Plus, if I wanted to keep TTL for all units I think I'd have to purchase one of these (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=64228&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation), but I'm not positive. Another product is the Microsync, an equally epensive option (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=search&Q=&b=1876&mnp=0.0&mxp=0.0&Submit.x=5&Submit.y=11&Submit=Go&shs=radio+slaves&ci=1&ac=). Also of mention is the high price of the flashes themselves. IMO Canon's flashes are rip-offs (see below comparison). SO, basically I'm going to try to acheive the same effect on the cheap.
First up, lets do a flash comparison. I'll be comparing flash units that are around $200.00 (Canon application).
First up is the Canon 430EX: ($234.00 at BHPhoto http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=397664&is=USA&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation ). From the Canon website:
This exciting new addition to the EOS System combines compact size and affordability with an added dose of features and sophistication. Improving on the previous model, Speedlite 420EX, the new 430EX can now be set into manual flash mode (full power~1/64). Flash compensation can be set on the flash unit, and manual control of the flash zoom head is now possible. Improvements in its circuitry make recycle time 40% faster, and since it is compatible with Canon's wireless E-TTL, it can be used as an affordable "slave unit."
The Basic stats are as follows:
GN (Guide Number): 141 ft./43m (at ISO 100); flash head at 105mm zoom setting.
Number of flashes per battery life: Approx. 200 to 1,400, with AA-size Alkaline Batteries.
Recycling Time: Approx. 0.1 to 3.7 seconds
Weight: 11.6 oz without batteries.
(Full Stats avalible here: http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelTechSpecsAct&fcategoryid=141&modelid=11923 )
Second is the SunPak PZ5000: ($147 at BH Photo http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=177009&is=REG&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation) Specs as follows:
GN (Guide Number): 165' (50.3 m) at 85mm;
180' (54.9 m) at 135m
Number of flashes per battery life: N/A
Recycling Time: 0.3-13 Seconds (based on fresh batteries & full power)
Weight: 12.96 oz without batteries.
Both units can be operated in full manual mode, TTL, and slave modes. So if you ask me, the Sunpak is the better deal. It offers close to the same performance as the Canon, for a cheaper price.
So far, the bill is $ 147.50 without shipping from BHphotovideo.com. I also said that I'm going to want to fire multiple units, so as opposed to having to purchase multiple SunPak's, I thought I'd search for some older, cheaper flashes that can function as slaves.
1.) http://cgi.ebay.com/SUNPAK-AUTO-THYRISTOR-144-FLASH-w-BOX-LN-1-00NR_W0QQitemZ150005073078QQihZ005QQcategoryZ48549 QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem + http://cgi.ebay.com/Flash-Slave-with-External-Sync-NEW_W0QQitemZ120003119363QQihZ002QQcategoryZ30086Q QrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem + http://cgi.ebay.com/Wireless-Radio-Remote-Flash-Strobe-slave-Trigger-Studio_W0QQitemZ150007998626QQihZ005QQcategoryZ300 84QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
2.) Another 144 http://cgi.ebay.com/SUNPAK-144D-Multi-Dedicated-Auto-FLASH-Nice-gl_W0QQitemZ110004440323QQihZ001QQcategoryZ48549QQ rdZ1QQcmdZViewItem + above link +above link.
So thats an estimated $50-$80 added onto the tab of $147.50. What i'm wondering is first, if there are any problems with this setup , and second if there are any other suggestions on how to go about this setup. Thanks!